Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
undetermined SOT = FMV of 100% of B

Question

From: (Redacted)
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 20102:43 PM
To: Verne,B. Michael

Subject: Filing Question

Michael,

I think I spoke to you earlier about thefollowing transaction, all parts of which are closing contemporaneously:

1.A forms C, a limited liability company,and contributes to it $55M in capital.

2.S, B's sole shareholder, sells 80% ofthe stock of B to C for $55M.

3.S sells the balance of the stock of B toC for a 20% interest in C.

4.A has total assets or annual net salesof > $126.9M

5.B has annual net sales of > $126.9Mand total assets of > $12.7M.

You suggested that I can view thetransaction as the formation of C by A, which is an exempt transaction,followed by the purchase of B's stock by C. You then stated that the purchaseprice is $55M. Why wouldn't the 20% interest in C also be considered part ofthe purchase price?

If the 20% interest in C that S acquiresis included in determining the Size of Transaction, I'm stumbling on how tovalue it. C's sole asset before the transaction is the $55M in cash paid to S, andafter the transaction is the stock of B. Would the 20% interest in C be valuedin relation to the price being paid for B? If so, I think its value =.2($55M/.8) = $13.75. If added to the $55M cash purchase price, the value ofB's stock held by C as a result of the transaction would be $68.75, exceedingthe $63.4M Size of Transaction Test.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.