Skip to main content
Date

Tags:

Rule
801.2(e)
Staff
Kate Walsh
Response/Comments

Analyze potential backside filing requirements (801.2(e)) based on where the entities stand before the main transaction.  

Question

From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:09 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Interpretation Question Regarding Rule 802.10

You analyze companies as they stand before the transaction.  So, here any backside filing would be exempt under 802.4 because all X holds is cash and cash equivalents. 

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Subject: Interpretation Question Regarding Rule 802.10

Hi Kate,

We are analyzing whether there is the need for a potential backside filing based on the facts below and we would appreciate your insight.

Corporation X is a blank check development stage company. Corporation X was formed as public company for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or assets. Corporation X is a “shell company” as defined under Regulation M under the Exchange Act of 1934 because Corporation X has no operations and nominal assets consisting solely of cash and/or cash equivalents. Corporation X generated less than $0.5 million of non-operating income in the form of interest on cash and cash equivalents from the proceeds derived from the Public Offering in the most recent fiscal year.

Corporation X will be acquiring all of the non-corporate interests of Company ABC.  Certain Company ABC non-corporate interest holders will receive in excess of $78.2 million of Corporation X voting securities as partial consideration for the transaction; however, no such rollover holder will have a per centum increase in its indirect ownership of  Company ABC (i.e., indirect ownership of Company ABC through Corporation X) as a result of the transaction. The only operations within Corporation X will be the non-operating interest income generated by Corporation X and that of Company ABC. A filing will be required for Corporation X to acquire Company ABC.

Given the above, do you agree that the ABC non-corporate holders receiving in excess of $78.2 million of Corporation X voting securities do not have a backside filing obligation pursuant to 16 CFR 802.10?  Please see https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program/informal-interpretations/0904003.

We very much appreciate your assistance.

Best regards,

[REDACTED]

 

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.