Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1; 7A(c)(1)
Staff
Victor Cohen
Response/Comments
Since not non-income producing - still exempt

Question

(redacted)

June 10, 1987

Victor Cohen
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Victor:

This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of Thursday, June 4, concerning the applicability of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and regulations to a proposed acquisition. During the course of that telephone conversation, I described to you the following proposed transaction:

Corporation A, an entity included within person A, intends to acquire certain
parcels of real property. Corporation As sole business consists of investment in
undeveloped real property. Corporation A proposes to acquire one parcel of real
property that is owned entirely by Corporation B, and a second parcel of real
property that is owned 50% by Corporation B and 50% by Corporation C.
Corporation B and C estimate that there are non-petroleum based mineral
deposits beneath less than 10% of the total acreage involved, and further advise
that certain test holes were drilled to establish the existence of those mineral
deposits. All of the real estate, however, remains totally unimproved, and
portions of the real estate are under lease by Corporations B and C to third
parties for various agricultural purposes.

Based in the foregoing description of facts, you confirmed our view that the proposed acquisition of undeveloped real property by corporation A is exempt from the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act pursuant to 7A(c) (1) of the Clayton Act and 16 C.F.R 802.1 of the Premerger Regulations.

If your recollection of the above conversation differs in any respect that would affect the applicability of the above exemptions to the proposed transaction, please contact me.

We thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Best regards.

Sincerely,

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.