Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Patrick Sharp
Response/Comments
I concur - 3-21-88

Question

(redacted)

March 16, 1988

Patrick Sharp
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580
 

Subject: Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act Of 1976

Dear Mr. Sharp:

This will confirm our telephone conversation today concerning the exemption from reporting under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 for acquisitions of goods or realty transferred in the ordinary course of business.

I described for you a proposed asset acquisition in which the buyer, a forest products company, would purchase a tract of timberland. Although timber has been harvested from the tract of timberland in the past, harvesting operations have not been conducted for several years. The assets to be transferred do not include any sawmills or other conversion facilities.

You indicated that it is the current position of the staff of the Federal Trade Commission that such an acquisition would be exempt because it involved only a sale of raw land (i.e., land and growing timber without any mills, conversion facilities, manufacturing plants or the like) and because the timberland is being purchased as a basic raw material for the buyers regular business, the manufacture and sale of forest products.

Thank you for y our assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.