Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.21
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
OK-8/4/88-Limited to the facts.

Question

(redacted)

August 3, 1988

Wayne Kaplan
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

I here confirm my understanding of our telephone discussion on August 1, 1988. That discussion concerned the applicability of the exception provided by 802.21 of the HSR Regulations from the notice and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act to the Second Transaction described below.

FACTS.

1. The First Transaction.

In December, 1987, Company A (the acquiring person) made an HSR filing at the $15 million threshold to acquire voting securities of Company C (the issuer). 
All other persons required to do so made HSR filings in respect of the said acquisition.
The waiting period expired.
Thereafter, Company A acquired more than 415 million but less than 15% of the voting securities of Company C.

2. Acquisition of Company C.

In 1988, Company B acquired all of the voting securities of Company C in consequence of a tender offer.
Company A tendered to Company B all of the voting securities of Company C which Company A had previously acquired.
Company C continues to exist, under its original charter, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company B.

3. The Second Transaction.

Company A proposes to buy from Company B more than $15 million but less than 15% of the voting securities of company C.

QUESTION.

Is the Second Transaction exempt from the notice and waiting period requirements of the HSR in consequence of the exemption provided by 802.21 of the HSR Regulations?

ANALYSIS.

As I stated during the course of our aforementioned telephone conversation, my analysis if the question presented is based on the following points.

A. The Acquiring Person in the Second Transaction (3 above) is identical to the Acquiring Person in the First Transaction (1 above).

B. All persons required to make HSR filings in connection with the First Transaction made such filings.

C. The HSR waiting period for the First Transaction expired; the First Transaction was consummated within one year thereafter [see 803.7 of the HSR Regulations]; and the Second Transaction will be consummated within five years after expiration of the HSR waiting period pertaining to the First Transaction.

D. The Issuer in the Second Transaction is identical to the Issuer in the First Transaction.

Therefore, the Second Transaction is exempt from the notice and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act under 802.21 of the HSR Regulations, notwithstanding the fact that the Issuer the voting securities of which will be acquired in the Second Transaction, although precisely the same as the Issuer the voting securities of which were acquired in the First Transaction, is now included within an Acquired Person within which it was not included at the time of the First Transaction.

I understand that you concur in the conclusion set out in the preceding paragraph.

During our aforementioned telephone conversation, you inquired particularly as to whether the Issuer was in fact precisely the same in the First and Second Transactions. I responded:

a. that the Issuer had sold certain lines of business after having become a wholly-owned subsidiary of company b, but had made no significant additions to its business; and

b. that I believed, but was not sure, that the Issuer was precisely the same in a corporate sense at the time of the Second Transaction as it had been at the time of the First Transaction.

I have subsequently inquired into the possibility that the identity of the Issuer may have been changed in a corporate sense, and hereby confirm that the Issuer is now precisely the same, in a corporate sense, as it was at the time of the First Transaction.

If the above summary of our discussion varies form your recollection of it in any way, or if you have further comments regarding the applicability of 802.21 to the Second Transaction, I would appreciate your contracting me as soon as possible and in any event before the close of business on Thursday, August 11, 1988. Thank you for your valuable assistance.

Very truly yours,

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.