Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1; 802.63
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
The writer was advised that the transaction involving the (redacted) might qualify as exempt under 802.63 as well as possibly 802.1 if the sale were to a person which does not compete in the same businesses as the (redacted) was being used. In that event the securities transaction alone is not reportable. 8/30/88

Question

(redacted)

August 29, 1988

VIA EXPRESS MAIL

Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Sirs:

I am writing to request an informal interpretation of the Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notification rules, in particular of 7A(c)(1) of the Act and 802.1 of the Rules relating to acquisitions of realty transferred in the ordinary course of business.

Our client (the Company is (redacted) It proposes to sell a package of voting securities and (redacted) to an investor. The transaction is essentially a means of financing for the Company, inasmuch as it intends (but will not be obligated) to repurchase the (redacted) for use in its (redacted) operations.

In the proposed transaction, the company will sell to one or more institutional investors approximately (redacted), and will retain an options to repurchase such (redacted) Assets incrementally over a four year period at a price that will include interest from the date of the sale. The Company intends to repurchase the (redacted) Assets for use in its ongoing (redacted) operations over a period of 18-24 months.

Concurrently with the (redacted) Assets sale, the Company will sell 150,000 Units to the same investor(s) at a price of $100 per Unit, or $15 million in total. Each Unit will consist of one share of $7.00 non-cumulative redeemable convertible Preferred Stock and 20 common stock purchase Warrants. The Preferred Stock, voting as a class, will be entitled to elect 20% of the Companys board members.

We believe that the proposed transaction is exempt from the requirements of the Act, whether engaged in by one or more investors, because (1) the acquisition of the (redacted) Assets is exempt under 7A(c)(1) and 802,1 as in the ordinary course of business, and (2) the sale of the Preferred Stock is exempt under 802.20 because its value (determined pursuant to 801.10(a) (2) (i)) is not in excess of $15 million. Our analysis is as follows:

(1) The (redacted) Assets. While the company has not previously sold this quantity of (redacted) to an unaffiliated entity in a single transaction, it does sell (redacted) in the regular course of its business. Such (redacted) are considered by the Company and carried on its books as inventory; they are not income-producing assets. Furthermore, since the (redacted) Assets to be sold constitute only about 40% of the Companys inventory of such type of assets (and about 20% of the Companys total (redacted) inventory), 802.1(b) does not apply.

(2) The Preferred Stock. Even if the entire value of the Units is attributed to the Preferred Stock, and none to the Warrants, the value of the Preferred Stock under 801.10(a) (2) (i) is not in excess of $15 million. There would be no basis for attributing any of the consideration for the (redacted) Assets to the Preferred Stock, on the possible theory that the (redacted) Assets market value might be less than their acquisition price, because the (redacted) Assets will be conveyed at the Companys book cost which is below their market value.

We request an informal interpretation that in these circumstances no filing is required for the proposed transaction, including the companys planned repurchase of the (redacted) Assets. If you have any questions or wish further information, Please contact me. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

(Redacted)

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.