Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(b); 801.11
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
I concur - called Mr. (redacted) 3/20/89 PS

Question

(redacted)

Patrick Sharpe
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Patrick Sharpe:

This will confirm our telephone conversation of March 16, 1989, in which you advised me as follows:

1. Determination of what persons are included within an entity, for the purpose of determining whether that person should be consolidated with the entity under 16 C.F.R. 801.11(b)(l) in establishing size of person, is to be made as of the date the transaction at issue is proposed to be consummated. Our Client, X, had control of a corporation, Y, at calendar (the fiscal) year end because, although X owned less 50% of the outstanding voting securities of Y, X had the contract6ual right presently to designated a majority of the directors of Y. Y had more than $100 million in sales and assets, and if, because of control by X over Y, Y was a person included within X under 16 C.F.R. 801.11(b)(1), X would have had more than $100 million in sales and assets after consolidation withY. X will have disposed, however, of all of its voting securities in Y, and of its rights to designated directors of Y, before the transaction at issue is consummated. After disposing of Y, the only substantial assets X will have will consist of cash, in an amount substantially less than $100 million; X will have had no sales other than those made by Y. As long as the ultimate parent of the other party to the transaction at issue has less than $100 million in sales or assets, no report will be required because X will not be viewed as having more than $100 million in sales or assets.

The only control test applicable to a limited partnership is the test set forth in 16 C.F.R. 801.1(b)(1)(ii) (50 percent or more of the profits of the entity, or having the right in the event of dissolution to 50 percent or more of the assets of the entity). The alternative test set forth in 16 C.F.R. 801(b)(2) (right to designate a majority of directors of individuals exercising similar function in the case of unincorporated entities) is not applicable to limited partnerships, as per example 2 to 16 C.F.R. 801.1(b). A sole general partner of a limited partnership that does not have the interest or rights described in 16 C.F.R. 801.1(b)(1)(ii) would therefore not control the limited partnership.

Our client intends to close a transaction without filing any report in reliance, in part, on this advice. If I have misstated or misinterpreted your advice, or if further information is necessary to confirm your advice, I would appreciate your letting me know right away.

 

Sincerely,

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.