Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(8)
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
8906001
Response/Comments
Please note - I am not an attorney. (redacted) has sold institution and now doesnot come under the jurisdiction of the FHLBB. Can the prior C-8 exemption applyto acquiring v/s of (redacted) - no. Also, in the prior C-8" exemption filing, anynon-regulated business of (redacted) maybe subject to filing under H-S-R. SeePremerger Practice manual #21& #24 H-S-R. Called (redacted)

Question

(redacted)


Patrick Sharpe, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Constitution at 10th Street
Washing ton, D.C. 20580


Dear Mr. Sharp:


On December 9, 1988, the Premerger Notification Office of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) received informational material submitted by (redacted) Section 7A(c)(8) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 18a(c)(8), and Section 802.6(a) of the premerger notification rules, in connection with the proposed acquisition by (redacted) of up to 25.1 percent of voting securities (the Transaction) of (redacted), at the time the Holding Company of (redacted) (Institution). The material submitted included Applications H-(e)1 and H-(g) pursuant to Section 408(e)(1)(B) of the National Housing Act and Section 584.4(b) of the Regulations for Savings and Loan Holding Companies (Applications) filed by (redacted) with the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) and with the (redacted) Department of Banking and Finance. Amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the applications were also forwarded to your office and to the DOJ all more than thirty days ago.


May 30, 1989, (redacted) received notice from the FHLBB that approval of the Transaction had been granted subject to certain conditions.


May 31, 1989, (redacted) completed the sale of the Institution to (redacted) thereby terminating further FHLBB review of the Transaction. (Redacted) intends to complete the Transaction, through open market and private purchases, in the coming months.


(Redacted) have relied upon the exemption in Section 7A(c)(8) for compliance with the premerger notification requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in connection with the Transaction.


The process of filing Applications with the FHLBB and obtaining authorization to proceed with the Transaction has taken approximately six months. The FTC and the DOJ have available to them all relevant information with respect to the Transaction, and have had an opportunity to make a complete review thereof.


Prior to lodging the Application s with the FHLBB to gain approval of the Transaction, on or about October 8, 1988, (redacted) filed a Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions with the FTC and the DOJ in connection with open market purchases of 2.5 percent of the voting securities of (redacted) (As indicated in the Applications (redacted) subsequently acquired an additional 7.4 percent of the common stock of (redacted) and currently owns 9.9 percent of such shares.)


We believe that (redacted) have complied with all requirements of the applicable exemption, as well as with the premerger notification rules regarding the Applications. We further believe that, notwithstanding the cessation of FHLBB review in light of (redacted) sale of the Institution, the applicable exemption renders unnecessary further filings with your office by (redacted) until and unless ownership levels in (redacted) beyond that stated in the Transaction are approached. Therefore, we stated in the Transaction are approached. Therefore, we respectfully request that you provide us confirmation that no additional filings are or will be required in order to consummate the Transaction.


Thank you for your consideration. If you would like to discuss this matter, please do not hesitate to call this office.


Very truly yours,




cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.