Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.11
Staff
Richard Smith
File Number
9009009
Response/Comments
9/18/90 Advised (redacted) that pursuant to Rule 801.11, the size of person test includesthe acquired person plus all entities it controls. He agreed and stated that the acquiredperson controls no one else. Further advised that if goodwill appears on balance sheet asan asset then it must be included in size test. Dick Smith

Question

(redacted)


September 14, 1990

via federal express

Mr. Richard Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Confirmation of Advice Regarding Necessity of Filing Pre-Merger Notification Form


Dear Mr. Smith:


This letter is intended to confirm out telephone conversation of September 12, 1990, in which we discussed the necessity of filing a pre merger notification form in this particular transaction. We have discussed this matter on two previous occasions, and I have attached both letters for your review.


The transaction, as it is now structured, will involve only the sale of the assets of the "acquired person" for a conditional purchase price of $29,000,000. It is our concern that although the book value of the assets of the acquired person is only $4,000,000, and the annual sales approximately $3,000,000, because we are selling the assets for $29,000,000 we might be subject to pre-merger notification filing. However, you have confirmed that the "size of the person" test is determined by the book value of the assets as reflected on the last regularly prepared financial statements, provided such financial statements are no more than fifteen months old. Accordingly, it is our understanding that the change in structure of the anticipated transaction from a stock sale to an asset sale will not trigger the filing of a pre-merger notification form.


I understand that we cannot receive a written opinion in the form of a no-action letter from your office. However, if in re-reviewing this transaction you have determined that we have misinterpreted the law and regulations with regard to pre-merger notification filings, or that the facts of this situation conjure up a "red flag" which should be further investigated, we would appreciate you advising us of this fact.


If we do not hear from your office to the contrary, we will proceed with this transaction on the assumption we do not have to file a pre-merger notification form. Thank you for your time and attention in re-reviewing this matter. I look forward to discussing any further comments or suggestions that you might have regarding same.


Very truly yours,



(redacted)


(redacted)

Attachments

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.