Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
I concur PS-called 8-12-91

Question

August 7, 1991

 

Premerger Notification Office

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303

Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Necessity of filing Hart-Scott-Rodino application for sale and purchase of (redacted) located in (redacted).

 

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

The purpose of this letter is to memorialize our conversations of August 2 and August 6, 1991 wherein you confirmed my interpretation that, under the statutes, rules and regulations promulgated under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (H.S.R.), no filing would be required for a transaction involving the sale of an office/hotel mixed use complex where the hotel component of such a mixed complex is valued below the $15,000,000 threshold governing asset sale transactions. As I described to you in our conversation, the hotel component of the subject mixed use complex is valued well below said $15,000,000 threshold amount. Specifics of our transaction are as follows:

The complex consists of an office building, hotel building and parking garage. Our client, (redacted) will purchase the entire complex from (redacted) for a total purchase price of $23,500,000. Immediately thereafter (or simultaneously therewith), we will sell the office building to an affiliate of (redacted) for $13,388,000. The record ownership of the parking garage will be in the name of (redacted) and (redacted) will each have rights in the use of same, (redacted) rights arising through an easement agreement to be executed and recorded at the closing of the transaction. (Redacted) will have a right to use approximately 28% of the parking spaces located in the parking garage.) will be approximately $10,112,000.

As I stated to you in our conversations, I believed the foregoing facts firmly establish a valuation for the hotel far below the #15,000,000 threshold amount. In our conversations, you confirmed my interpretation, stating that under the existing statutes, rules and regulations governing H.S.R., no filing would be necessary where the hotel component of a mixed use complex was valued at below said $15,000,000 threshold amount. You confirmed that an immediate resale of the non-hotel portion to a bona fide purchaser would provide firm evidence of the valuation of the remaining (hotel) portion of the complex.

In the event you have any questions or comments in relation to any of the foregoing, please call me at (redacted). Thanks again for taking the time to talk with me on this matter.

Very truly yours.

(Redacted)


 

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.