Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
W. Schechter
Response/Comments
Writer told that this was NOT an exempt transaction. WS called (redacted) andtold that this transaction was not exempt. WS discussed this letter with R Smithand N. Ovuka, and they concurred.

Question

November 19, 1991


 

VIA FACSIMILE

William J. Schechter

Federal Trade Commission

Room 311

Sixth and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20580

 

Dear Mr. Schechter:

This letter provides further information concerning our telephone conversation of Monday, November 18, 1991, in which I requested your advice as to whether the transaction described below is subject to the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (the Act). The transaction satisfies the size-of-persons and size-of-transaction tests established in the Act. I would like confirmation that the proposed transaction is nevertheless exempt from the requirements of the Act pursuant to section 7A(c)(1) because it is essentially an acquisition of unimproved realty.

Company A (the Buyer) is a $100 million person. Company B (the Seller) is a $10 million person. Buyer plans to acquire from Seller an option to purchase land for approximately $25 million. An approximately 250 room hotel is located on the land. The hotel is currently in operation, but under the terms of the option agreement and related contract of sale, the hotel will no longer be in operation at the time the property is purchased by the Buyer. After the purchase of the property, the hotel will be demolished and the land will be utilized by the Buyer as a paid parking lot. Buyer has no intention of operating the hotel.

This transaction is exempt pursuant to section 7A(c)(1) of the Act as an acquisition of unimproved realty. At the time the land is purchased, it will not be an income producing property, and the former income producing activity, operation of the hotel, will never be engaged in by the Buyer. The only significance of the hotel to the Buyer is that it will have to be demolished. The property therefore clearly should be treated as unimproved realty for purposes of the section 7A(c)(1) exemption.

The parties to this transaction require an answer as soon as possible. Please call me to discuss whether you agree with our conclusion that the transaction is exempt from the reporting and waiting period requirements of the Act. If you have any questions prior to your determination, please do not hesitate to call.

Very truly yours,


 

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.