Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.63
Staff
T. Hancock
Response/Comments
OK. John Sipple expressed some reservations about a situation in which someone heard about this plan and bought up B bonds in order to acquire control of whatused to be B. Its not clear how this case would be distinguished perhaps it would fall under Sec. 801.90. That is not the case in this letter. TFH

Question

November 26, 1991

HAND DELIVERY

Thomas Hancock, Esq.
Federal Trade Commission
Premerger Notification Office
Room H-303
6th St. and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20580
 

Dear Mr. Hancock:

I am writing this letter to confirm the oral advice you provided yesterday regarding the nonreportability of the following transaction:

A controls 100% of the voting securities of B, a corporation in Chapter 11 bankruptcy which has defaulted upon its bonds. Pursuant to a Court-
approved reorganization plan, Bs current bondholders will exchange their
bonds for voting securities in two new corporate entities, B-1 and B-2,
that together will control substantially all the assets previously held by B.

You indicated that the exchange of Bs bonds for voting securities in B-1 and B-2 by each of Bs bondholders would be exempt from any Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act filing requirements, based upon 16 C.F.R. Sec. 802.63(a) of the Hart-Scott regulations.

You thus indicated that the exchange of bonds for voting securities by each bondholder, regardless of the particular facts concerning the size of person or transaction or the bondholders business, would qualify under Sec. 802.63(a) as: (1) an acquisition upon default or in connection with a bona fide debt workout; and (2) an acquisition made by a creditor in a bona fide credit transaction entered into in the ordinary course of the creditors business.

If the above does not accurately reflect the advice you provided, please telephone me immediately.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

Very truly yours,


 

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.