Skip to main content
Date
Rule
803.7; 801.1(c)
Staff
Victor Cohen
Response/Comments
Underlying facts indicate that beneficial ownership has not passed to B; the loan is not the purchase of assets.

Question

July 7, 1992

BY HAND DELIVERY

Victor L. Cohen, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition, Room 303
Federal Trade Commission
Sixth St. and Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Victor:

I am writing this letter to confirm the oral advice which you provided in telephone conversations on June 18 and 26 regarding the time for filing Hart-Scott notification with respect to the following transaction.

As we discussed, ultimate parent entities A and B have entered into an agreement under which B will acquire from a for $20 million an undivided interest in certain pipeline assets. the acquisition cannot be consummated until approved by FERC, as process that may take as long as two years.

Pursuant to a preclosing agreement, A will provide pipeline transportation to B, subject to the terms and conditions of As FERC tariffs. In return, B will make a $20 million interest free loan to A. The foregone loan interest will be Bs payment for the transportation proviced. The $20 million loan will be repaid by B at closing and B will the tender to A the purchase price.

If the acquisition fails to be consummated within certain specified time limits, B may demand repayment of the loan. A then has three repayment options. A may: (1) repay the loan in full within 10 days; (2) repay the loan in 12 monthly installments, with the unpaid balance subject to 12% interest; or (3) repay the loan providing pipeline transportation, with the unpaid balance subject to 12% interest payable in cash. If the third option is selected, the transportation would be provided at a specified rate within As FERC tariffs, but possible below then current market levels.

As we discussed, among the key factors for analysis are the following: (a) the $20 million loan will be fully repaid whether or not the acquisition is consummated; (b) the acquisition cannot be consummated without FERC approval; (c) until consummation, B will bear none of the risk of loss (e.g., a pipeline explosion); (d) if consummation does not occur for any reason, B will receive none of the benefit of detriment of any increase or decrease in the pipelines value; (e) until consummation, B is not liable for pipeline operating expenses; and (f) an preconsummation transportation to be received by B will be at rates and terms and conditions of service within As FERC tariff.

Based on all the above facts, you advised that beneficial ownership of the undivided pipeline interest to be acquired would not pass from A to B until consummation of the transaction following FERC approval. You thus advised that no Hart-Scott filing need be made by the parties prior to entering into the loan and transportation agreements described above. You further indicated that because Hart-Scott notification expires one year following expiration of the waiting period, 16 C.F.R. 803.7, the parties should file notification no earlier than one year prior to the expected consummation date of the transaction.

If the above does not accurately reflect the Hart-Scott advice you provided concerning the above transaction, please call me immediately. As always, thank you very much for time and most helpful assistance.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.