Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.10
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
If this is straight up, as is, with no side deals (contractual agreements, etc.) then this is ok. Otherwise, we are troubled lets talk. Called [redacted] 12-3-92. [Redacted] said that the parties will in [illegible] exceed the $13.7mm (now changed to $14.3mm) purchase price. Any extra inventories on hand will be taken by the acquired person or sold by the acquiring person or sold by the acquiring person on consignment. This is ok. Called [redacted] 12-4-92. JS concurs.

Question

December 2, 1992

BY HAND

Patrick Sharpe, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 321
Federal Trade Commission
6th and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Request for Informal Opinion on H-S-R
Reportability of Acquisition Scenario

Dear Patrick:

As we discussed by telephone today, set forth below is an acquisition scenario for which I would appreciate your opinion as to whether a similar transaction would be reportable under the H-S-R Rules and Regulations.

Company A intends to acquire certain retail leases, fixed assets and inventory from a debtor in possession (Company B). In addition, Company A will agree to guarantee a $500,000 line of credit for Company B, but it is not anticipated that Company A will be called on to pay any portion of the funds guaranteed. Including the guarantee, the acquisition price is expected to be approximately $13.7 million. As part of the agreement between Company A and Company B, a cap will be placed on how much inventory will be transferred at each retail location at the time of closing. Company A would rather not take any inventory, but as a condition of the sale Company B insisted that Company A commit to take a certain amount of inventory up to the established cap. If the inventory exceeds the cap at any location Company B will either retain or sell the inventory or Company A will agree to sell the Inventory for the benefit of Company B. From Company Bs perspective, a reason for placing the cap on inventory to be

transferred is a desire to keep the acquisition price below $15 million so that H-S-R filings will not be necessary. The reason why Company B does not want the acquisition price to exceed the $15 million filling threshold is because, for timing reasons, compliance with the H-S-R waiting period would make the transaction impractical. As stated previously, Company A would rather not take any inventory.

It is our believe (sic) that this potential acquisition is not competitively significant and the acquisition structure and purchase price are unrelated to any competition issues.

Under this fact scenario, where the acquisition price and the fair market value of the assets to be acquired is less than $15 million, is there any reason why this acquisition should be reported?

Sincerely,

[redacted]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.