Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(4)
Staff
Nancy Ovuka
Response/Comments
None

Question

Federal Trade Commission
Pre-Merger Office
Bureau of Competition
Sixth & Pennsylvania Avenue
Room 301, Northwest
Washington, D.C. 20580

Attention: Ms. Nancy Ovuka

Re: Exemption of California District
Hospitals from the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Pre-Merger Notification Requirements

Dear Ms. Ovuka:

This letter will confirm our recent telephone conversation concerning your response to our letter of January 14, 1993. In reply to our inquiries set forth in that letter, you stated as follows:

1.Our client, [redacted], is a political subdivision of the state of California and as such falls under the pre-merger notification political subdivision exemption of 15 U.S.C. 18a(c)4.

2.The assets and income of [redacted] and its controlled nonprofit subsidiary would not be pooled for purposes of the income and asset threshold of 15 U.S.C. 18a(a)2B should the subsidiary acquire a hospital.

Federal Trade Commission
February 4, 1993
Page 2

3.Should [redacted] acquire a hospital through its nonprofit subsidiary, the transaction would not qualify for the political subdivision exemption of 15 U.S.C. 18a(c)4 because the acquiring subsidiary would not be considered a political subdivision of the State.

Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,

[redacted]

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.