Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.90
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
See below

Question

March 15, 1994

BY HAND DELIVERY

Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Compliance Specialist
PreMerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition, Room H-303
Federal Trade Commission
6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

*SEE File #9403003

This letter will confirm the substance of our telephone conference this morning regarding a proposed transaction that was described in a March 7, 1994 letter to you from (redacted) of (redacted).

The proposed transaction involved the following potentially reportable events: (1) formation of a limited liability company; and (2) the withdrawal of certain partners from a preexisting partnership and the transfer of their partnership interests to other parties. I understand that both you and Richard Smith of your office have reviewed the March 7, 1994 letter.

*STAFF COMMENT: PS & RS

You have advised us that it is the opinion of the Staff of the Premerger Notification Office (Staff) that the proposed transaction, as set forth in the March 7, 1994 letter, does not trigger an obligation on behalf of any party to file a premerger notification and report form under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. In addition, you have confirmed that the Staff would not view the structure of the proposed transaction as a device to avoid filing under 16 C.F.R. 801.90, based on the representations in the March 7, 1994 letter.

Once again, thank you for your assistance in this matter.

*NO ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS

Sincerely,

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.