Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.11
Staff
Dick Smith
Response/Comments
3/10/95-Advised caller that the Corporate Partner must bring up the Sellers balance sheet and financial statement (in their entirety, and not just 99% thereof) and add them to its own (excluding the value of its 99% holding in partnership) in the balance sheet consolidation process in order to determine its size. Writer confirms that Corporate Partner controls no other entity. Therefore its consolidated sales and assets as of 12/31/94 were below $18 MM. Deal is expected to close in mid-May, 1005 so data on consolidated balance is within 15 month requirement of 801.11(b)(2). Since acquired person is not a $10 MM person, no filing required. RB Smith

Question

March 9, 1995

VIA FACSIMILE TO: (redacted)

AND ORIGINAL VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL


Dick Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Compliance with Hart-Scott-Rodino Statute

Dear Mr. Smith:

This will confirm my understanding, based on our conversation, that in the staffs view the following transaction is not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR). As we discussed, this firm is counsel to an entity (Purchaser) that has contracted to acquire substantially all of the assets of another company (Seller) pending the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent to closing.

Assume, for purposes of this letter, that the ultimate parent entity of Purchaser has in excess of $100 million in assets and that it will acquire assets valued in excess of $15 million from the ultimate parent entity of Seller. The issues addressed herein are who is (are) the ultimate parent entity(ies) of Seller and whether any ultimate parent entity of the Seller has sales or assets of at least $10 million based upon its last regularly-prepared income statement and balance sheet, respectively. Set forth below are the pertinent facts.

Seller is a limited partnership. The partners of Seller are a corporation (99% general partnership interest) (Sellers Corporate Partner) and an individual (1% limited partnership interest). The limited partner does not have the right to 505 or more of the profits or the right, in the event of dissolution, to 50% or more of the assets of Seller. Moreover, the limited partner does not have the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the individuals exercising the functions similar to a board of directors in a corporation. Therefore, we have concluded that the limited partner of Seller is not an ultimate parent entity of Seller.

The stockholders of Sellers Corporate Partner are four individuals (a parent and three adult children). No individual stockholder holds 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of Sellers Corporate Partner, nor does any individual stockholder have the right to 50% or more of the profits or the right, in the event of dissolution, to 50% or more of the assets of Sellers Corporate Partner. Moreover, no stockholder has the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the board of directors of Sellerss Corporate Partner.

Based upon its balance sheet as of December 31, 1994 and its statement of operations for the year then ended, Seller had assets of approximately $3.5 million and revenues of approximately $3.67 million. Based upon its balance sheet as of December 31, 1994 and its statement of operations for the year then ended, Sellers Corporate Partner had assets of approximately $3.67 million (inclusive of its 99% interest in Seller) and revenues of approximately $3.86 million (inclusive of its 99% interest in Seller). The financial statements of Sellers and Sellers Corporate Partner as of December 31, 1994 and for the year then ended are attached hereto as Exhibits ?A? and B, respectively. Please note that the financial statements of Sellers Corporate Partner as of December 31, 1994 and for the year then ended are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively. Please note that the financial statements of Sellers Corporate partner exclude its 99% interest in Seller.

Based upon the foregoing, our view, with which you have tentatively agreed is that because Sellers Corporate partner, as the ultimate parent entity of Seller, did not have sales or assets of at least $10 million based upon its last regularly-prepared income statement and balance sheet, respectively, that the transaction is not reportable under the HSR Act.

We would appreciate receiving from you at your earliest convenience your concurrence with the conclusions set forth above. If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter.

Very truly yours,

(Redacted)

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.