Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1(acq of timberland)
Staff
Melea Epps
Response/Comments
2/27 - I called the author today and confirmed that his conclusion regarding the acquisition was correct. I emphasized that this conclusion is the informal advice of the PNO, not the Commission

Question

February 27, 1996

VIA FACSIMILE 202-326-2624

Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Exemption of sale of timberland from filing requirements

Dear Melia:

This letter is to confirm our conversations regarding the proposed sale of timberland by my client. It is my understanding that there is no need to make a premerger filing for the transaction described below.

My client intends to sell approximately 27,000 acres of timberland. The land represents much less than 15% of the assets of my client. The fair market value of all land being sold is in excess of 15 million dollars. But the value of the Blocks of land from which timber has been harvested in the last five years is much less than 15 million dollars.

My client has managed its timberland in Blocks for many years. The land being sold was not assigned to Blocks for purposes of this transaction. This management includes, among other things, cutting, preparation, and tree planting activities. My client keeps track of what timber is harvested by Blocks and can determine by Blocks from what portion of the land timber has been harvested in the last five years.

It is my understanding that in determining whether a filing is necessary for this transaction, my client may exclude the value of the Blocks from which no timber has been harvested in the last five years.

I would appreciate it if you would confirm receipt of this letter. It is also my understanding that you will notify me by phone immediately and in writing by tomorrow, Wednesday February 28, if you disagree with any portion of this letter.

Sincerely,

[redacted]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.