Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(a)
Staff
John Sipple
Response/Comments
Confirmed that it is proper to view this transaction as an acquisition by A of the assetsof B, since A will control the Board of Newco at the time of acquisition with the powerto appoint 13 of 18 of Newcos directors upon formation. As such, the acquisition isexempt because it does not meet the size of transaction test. JMS

Question

(redacted)

April 26, 1996

HAND DELIVER

John M. Sipple, Esquire
Assistant Director
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Room 388
Sixth Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Hart-Scott-Rodino Reportability of (redacted) Transaction

Dear John:

We represent an approximately (redacted) (A) that wishes to acquire a much smaller (redacted) (B). We do not believe that the transaction is reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. 18a, for the reasons given below. However, the parties would like to confirm this assessment with your office.

(Redacted) with assets of over $200,000,000. It wishes to acquire (redacted) B, a much smaller (redacted) in severe financial difficulty. Although (redacted) B has slightly more than (redacted) for some time there have been fewer than 20 (redacted) in the (redacted) each day and this number is declining. Although the transaction is an acquisition of the smaller (redacted) by the larger, due to community relations issues, it will be carried out by the creation of a new parent company that will become the sole corporate member of both (redacted). No cash will change hands, but the new parent will be responsible for the liabilities of (redacted) B, which are approximately $4,000,000 at formation. (Redacted) A will be the controlling entity of the new parent, holding 13 of 18 Board seats. (Thereafter, the Board will select its own members.) Because (redacted) A will appoint the majority of the Board of the new parent at the time the affiliation is accomplished, the parties believe the transaction should be viewed as an acquisition of (redacted) B by (redacted) A.

In connection with the sale of its assets, (redacted) B commissioned an appraisal, on a going business basis, of its fair market value, which resulted in valuation of slightly over

$5,000,000. The fair market value of all of its assets is approximately $8,000,000. Thus, the proposed transaction, viewed as an acquisition of (redacted) B by (redacted) does not meet the size-of-transaction test.

The parties believe that, given these facts, the transaction is not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Once you have reviewed this letter, please call me with your comments.

Very truly yours,

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.