Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.13(b)
Staff
Joseph Krauss
File Number
9802018
Response/Comments
3/11/98 Confirmed w/ writer that acquisition of new franchises would be looked at as a separate transaction from previously filed transaction and thresholds would be applicable. If acquisition did not meet size of transaction thresholds, then acquisition of the new franchises would not be reportable. JG Krauss

Question

(redacted)


 

February 24, 1998


Via Facsimile Transmission (202) 326-2624

Mr. Joseph Krauss, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Premerger Notification Analysis Issue (redacted) Transaction Number (redacted)


Dear Mr. Krauss:


This letter is to confirm the information in our exchange of telephone messages of February 18 and 19, 1998 regarding the application of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR Act) and the rules promulgated thereunder (redacted) the acquisition by a Subsidiary of (redacted) of four (redacted) preparation franchises (New Franchises). It is our understanding, based upon the data set forth below, that the acquisition of the New Franchises by (redacted) would not be a reportable transaction under the HSR and the HSR rules.


For purposes of this inquiry, we have assumed that (redacted) had in excess of $100 million in sales for the most recent year and the seller of the New Franchises has in excess of $10 million in sales and assets.


The seller of the New Franchises in the Estate of (redacted) which presently owns (redacted). Through a bidding process the Estate offered for sale all 79 Franchises owned. (redacted). Subsidiary was the successful bidder as to (redacted) (Acquired Franchises) and documents were exchanged between (redacted) and the (redacted) evidencing the acceptance of the successful bids. (redacted) was initially unsuccessful in bidding for the remaining five franchises held by the (redacted) (redacted) and the (redacted) made their respective Premerger filings under the HSR Act on January 24, 1998, which filings pertained solely to the acquisition of the Acquired Franchises. On January 30, 1998, early termination of the HSR Act waiting period was granted.


On February 12, 1998 (redacted) learned that because of difficulties with the original wining bid, Blocks subsidiary had become the winning bidder to acquire the New Franchises. The purchase price for the New Franchises is estimated to be approximately $2.47 million.

Based on these facts, we understand that the FTC Staff is of the view that no additional HSR filing would be necessary because the Size of Transaction Test would not be satisfied by the acquisition of the New Franchises. We understand that the Staff takes the position that under Rule 801. 13(b), the acquisition of the New Franchises would be analyzed as a separate transaction from the acquisition of the Acquired Franchises and as such must satisfy the HSR Acts Size of Transaction requirements in order to be reportable under the HSR Act.


Should you have any questions, or if our understanding is incorrect, please contact me at your earliest opportunity. The assistance and guidance that you have provided in this matter are very much appreciated.



Yours very truly,

(redacted)


[3/6/98 Confirmed if with that acquisition of new franchises would be looked at as a sign to transfer for (not legible) transaction and thereunder work (not legible) . If acquisition did not (not legible) not sure of transaction (not legible) then any (not legible) of the new franchise would not be reportable.]


 

 

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.