Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1 (e) (3)
Staff
Mike Verne
File Number
9803008
Response/Comments
Agree 3/16/98

Question

(redacted)

March 12, 1998


Michael Verne
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580



Dear Mr. Verne:


This is to confirm the content of our telephone conversation yesterday. Also, I have included in this letter several additional facts that we did not discuss in our conversation.


I inquired about determining the ultimate parent entity of a limited liability company (the LLC). I stated that an individual, A, owned the rights to 31% of the profits and assets upon dissolution of the LLC and that three separate irrevocable trusts, Trust-B, Trust-C and Trust-D, each owned the rights to 17% of the profits (and assets upon dissolution) of the LLC. The remaining interests in the LLC are owned by employees of the LLC who are not related to A. The trusts are not common trust funds or collective trust funds.


The beneficiary of Trust-B is As non minor child, E, the beneficiary of Trust-C is As non-minor child, F and the beneficiary of Trust D is As non minor child, G.


The trustee of each of the trusts is the same bank (the Bank). If the Bank resigns or is required to be replaced, an independent trust advisor )Trust Advisor) designates the successor trustee. A is the settler of the trusts. The trusts were established to effectuate a gift and to remove the trusts from ownership and control of the settler for income gift and estate tax purposes. As such, A does not retain any control over the trustee, or the replacement of the trustee and does not retain any reversionary interest in the trusts.


Given such facts, it is my understanding that the LLC is its own ultimate parent entity because there is no entity that owns the rights to 50% or more of the profits (or assets upon dissolutions) of the LLC. Under 16 C.F.R. 801.1 (e) (3), each trust is considered to be the holder of its assets and its own ultimate parent entity. The fact that the Statement of the Basis and Purpose provides that control of a trust is determined by whether an entity was contractual power to designate half or more of the trustees of the trust (43 Fed. Reg. 33,459; see ABA Premerger Notification Practice Manual, Interpretation 84, Commentary) does not alter the conclusion that neither the Bank nor the Trust Advisor is considered to control the trusts and, thus, that the LLC is its own ultimate parent entity.


Please contact me if you believe that any of the analysis contained in this letter is incorrect. I appreciate your assistance in this matter.
 

Sincerely,


(redacted)


cc: (redacted)


 

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.