Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.10, 801.14, 801.15
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
9803009
Response/Comments
Called (redacted) 3/13/98. Does not meet the size-of- transaction test. I concur with this letter

Question

(redacted)


March 12, 1998


Mr. Patrick Sharpe
FTC Premerger Office
202 326-2624


Dear Mr. Sharpe:


Thank you for your helpful comments in our telephone conversations today. I write to confirm the conclusions you provided me based on our initial discussion, your conference thereafter with Dick Smith and our follow-up discussion.

Corporations A and B each own 50% of the voting securities of joint venture corporation C. A, B and C are all foreign persons though that fact, as I understand it, is not relevant to conclusion (1.) below. (1.) A will sell to B its full 50% ownership interest in C. This transaction is exempt under 7A (c)(3) of the Statute. (2.) A will also sell to B certain assets owned by A outside the joint venture corporation. Those assets located in the United States have a value less than $15 million and are thus exempt under 802.51(c) of the Rules.


Notwithstanding the provisions of 801.15 on aggregation of the purchases of voting securities and assets, the FTC takes the position that control under 7A(c)(3) terminates consideration of all aggregation issues. Therefore, the acquisition of the assets located in the United States can be considered entirely independently of the transaction by which the corporate joint venture terminates in the 7A(c)(3)-exempt transaction described in (1.) above.


In summary, the voting securities transaction and the asset transaction are not to be aggregated in determining whether reporting should occur. Because the assets to be acquired which are located in the United States have a value less than $15 million (and are, therefore, exempt under 802.51(c) absent aggregation considerations which are inapplicable for the reasons given above), no reporting of this transaction is required.


Please let me know immediately if my understanding of the HSR reporting issues as expressed here is incorrect.


Best regards,


Sincerely,


(redacted)



About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.