Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.11(e)
Staff
Dick Smith
File Number
9805009
Response/Comments
Since LLC is only a 9.9 M person, no filings will be required for its formation even if the structure make it more like a corporation. RBSmith

Question

(redacted)

May 18, 1998


Richard Smith, Esquire
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580


Dear Mr. Smith:


This letter is to confirm the oral advice from your office given today in connection with the First Transaction described on the enclosed one-page memo and Ownership Structure chart, copies of which were faxed to you on May 15, prior to our discussion today.


Based upon the description of the parties and transactions in the attachments, and as further discussed with us, you have concluded that no premerger notification is required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act for Transaction One, either in connection with the formation of LLC, the formation of Holding Corp., or the acquisition by Holding Corp. of all of the outstanding shares of the Operating Company.


Your assumptions were correct that both LLC and Holding Corp. are newly formed for purposes of this transaction and do not have regularly prepared balance sheets. Substantially all of the $9.9 million being contributed to LLC by its members will be invested in Holding Corp. to fund the acquisition of Operating Company. Similarly, the aggregate $9.9 million and $2.4 million being contributed to Holding corp. by LLC and Existing Corp. will be used by Holding Corp. to fund the acquisition of Operating Company. Thus, in preparing the pro forma balance sheets for LLC and Holding Corp, such amounts would be subtracted, leaving LLC close to a zero dollar acquiring person. Rule 801.11(e).


Thank you for your prompt review and response to our inquiry.


Very truly yours,

(redacted)

[Please note: One page attachment follows on page 2, then the following]


The relevant facts to the analysis of whether a Pre-Merger Notification and Report Form (a HSR filing) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, is required, are as follows:


Transaction One:

1.Holding Corp. is being formed for the purpose of acquiring all the outstanding shares of Operating Company for a price in excess of $30 million. Holding Corp. is being capitalized with approximately $12.3 million, and will use substantially as such capitalization to fund the purchase price for the Operating Company. The balance of the purchase price will be financed through borrowing from an unaffiliated commercial bank and/or proceeds from sale of certain assets of the Operating Company in Transaction Two.

2.Operating Company is presently a wholly-owned subsidiary of a corporation with greater than $100 million in total assets and annual net sales.

3.LLC is being formed for this transaction and will own approximately 81% of the outstanding shares of Holding Corp. No member of the LLC has or controls 50% or more of the ownership interests in the LLC. No member of the LLC has the power to vote 50% or more of the voting interests in the LLC. No member of the LLC has the right to 50% or more interest in profit or liquidation distributions of the LLC. No investor in LLC or Holding Corp. is guaranteeing any loan or other indebtedness.


Transaction Two:

4.Shortly after Holding Corps acquisition of Operating Company, Holding Corp, intends to sell a substantial portion of its assets for in excess of $15 million to a third party with no relation to any of the direct or indirect investors in Holding Corp. The parties with respect to this asset sale will be making an HSR filing in connection with such transaction.

5.Based upon our research and the foregoing structure, we have concluded that HSR Filing is required for Transaction One, either in connection with the formation of LLC, the formation of Holding Corp,. or the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of Operating company.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.