Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.2
Staff
Richard B. Smith
File Number
9905015
Response/Comments
5/24/99-Called writer and advised that As providing B with advertising and promotional services and contract was not an acquisition of assets by B and illegible no report for this side of the transaction was required.

Question

(redacted)

May 21, 1999


Richard B. Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Smith:


This is to confirm our conversation on May 19, 1999 that only one filing is required for the transaction described below.

Company A is to receive 35% of the stock of Company B. Companies A and B meet the size-of-person test and the size-of-transaction test. The purchase price has been estimated by the purchaser, Company A, to be about $100 million.

As consideration for the receipt of the stock Company A will provide Company B advertising and promotional services and content. The issue is whether Company B will receive assets and, therefore, a second filing is necessary. You concluded that Company B was receiving ordinary course business services, and was not receiving assets of Company A. Therefore a filing is not necessary for the receipt of the services by Company B. A filing will be made for the acquisition of the stock by Company A.


Please advise me within three days of your receipt of this letter if you disagree with the above. Thank you very much.

Sincerely,


(redacted)


(redacted)

.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.