Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(c)(1)
Staff
Richard Smith
File Number
9909012
Response/Comments
9/30/99 - We do not [sic] the reportability of the second transaction, but antitrustreview of As cto for B, which includes company C, has been made. The transferof B to D (in this case not reportable) and the immediate return of D to A will notbe deemed a reportable event, due in large part to the earlier antitrust review. RB Smith

Question

Via Facsimile

Richard B. Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580


Re: Hart-Scott-Rodino


Dear Dick:

This will confirm our telephone conversation today regarding the transaction posed in my letter dated September 1, 1999 (copy attached). My question was whether the non-reportability of the sale of stock from Company A to Company D would change the analysis regarding whether Company As repurchase of Subsidiary C is a reportable event. You advised that this would not change your earlier advice that the immediate repurchase of Subsidiary C would not be subject to an HSR filing because in essence this transaction would be no different from Company A selling only to Company D those portions of Company B, except the stock of Subsidiary C.
 

As I explained, it appears that the sale from Company A to Company D would not be reportable because Company D would not meet the size of person test under 16 C.F.R. 801.11(c).


Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If the above does not comport with your understanding of our conversation, please advise me immediately.


Very truly yours,


(redacted)


(redacted)

Enclosure

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.