Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.50(b); 802.51(b)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree - no filing is required. N. Ovuka concurs.

Question

Michael Verne, Esq.
Pre-Merger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Room 303
Sixth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

            Re: Hart-Scott-Rodino Analysis of Foreign Corporate Joint Venture

Dear Mr. Verne:

            This will confirm our discussion with (redacted) on September 30, 1999. We discussed the following hypothetical situation:

            Company A (a United States person) and Company B (a foreign person) intend to create a joint venture (JV) incorporated under foreign law. Companies A and B each will hold fifty percent of JV’s voting securities. As consideration for these voting securities, Companies A and B will contribute to the joint venture cash and assets in the form of technology. No “entity” (as defined by 16 C.F.R. § 801(a)(2)), will be contributed to the joint venture.

            The aggregate book value of the assets-to-be-contributed to the JV are less than $15 million, based on the last regularly prepared balance sheets of Companies A and B. Revenues attributable to those assets during the most recent year exceeded $25 million.

            We discussed whether, under these circumstances, the creation of the joint venture by Companies A and B would be exempt from reporting under Rule 802.50 (with respect to Company A) and Rule 802.51 (with respect to Company B). With respect to Company B, we concluded that the acquisition would be exempt because Company B would not control a foreign issuer which would hold assets in the United States having an aggregate book value of $15 million or more. See 802.51(b)(1).

            With respect to Company A, we concluded that the transaction would be exempt under Rules 802.50(b) because Company A would not control a foreign issuer which would hold assets in the Untied States having an aggregate book value of $15 million or more, or made aggregate sales in or into the United States of $25 million or more in its most recent fiscal year. In this regard, we concluded that the provisions of subparagraph (2) of Rules 802.50(b) do not come in play because the joint venture does not yet exist and no entity is being contributed to the joint venture. Thus, the JV cannot be said to have had any revenues in its most recent fiscal year. 1

cc: (redacted)

Endnote:

1. In this regard the FTC staff construes Rule 802.50(b)(2) in a manner parallel to Rule 802.20(b). Specifically, the staff has taken the position that with respect to joint venture corporations that are not yet in existence and as to which no entities are being contributed, the parties may disregard for purposes of Rules 802.20(b) sales attributable to assets that will be contributed to the joint venture. See Interpretation No. 198, Premerger Notification Practice Manual (1991 ed.)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.