Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.40
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
This should be analyzed as the formation of D under 801.40. D is not an acquiring person with respect to the X voting securities being contributed by A, B & C.

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:22 PM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Subject: HSR Question

Hi Mike. I havea (hopefully quick) HSR interpretation question for you.

The fact patternis as follows:

A, B and Ccurrently hold 36%, 22% and 10% respectively of the voting securities in X. A,B and C are proposing to contribute their respective shareholdings in X to anew company, D. D will then hold 68% of the voting securities in X. A, B, and Cwill hold shares in D in the proportions of their contributions, so that Aholds 53%, B 32% and C 15%.

Assuming thevalue of the shares being contributed to D by each party exceeds $50 millionand all parties meet necessary size thresholds, how should this be analyzedunder HSR - as a joint venture under 801.40, sothat potentially only A, B and C have filings, or as the acquisition of 68% ofthe voting securities of X by D, so that filings will be made by X and D? Basedon other informal interpretations I have seen, I assume the former, but wantedto check for certain.

I am on the roadtomorrow, so please respond by email, or leave a voice mail and I will call youback.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.