Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Richard Smith
Response/Comments
9/24/91 (redacted) called. No time crunch on matter. Will obtain response to anyquestions and write new letter to me. RBS [note 1: Premerger NotificationOffices]

Question

September 19, 1991


 

Premerger Notification Office

Federal Trade Commission

6th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Room 303

Washington, D.C. 20580

 

Dear Sir or Madam::

 

I am writing to request your advice on whether the following proposed transaction is reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act.

A and B each owns 50% of the voting securities of a corporation (C) that owns 100% of the voting securities of:

 

(a) another corporation (D), which in turn, is the sole

general partner of, and controls (within the meaning of the

Hart-Scott-Rodino regulations), a limited partnership (E)

that owns real estate (the Real Estate), consisting of: (i)

office buildings; (ii) post office buildings, which are leased to

the United States Postal Service; and (iii) miscellaneous

buildings (the fair market value of the post offices is in excess

of $15 million; the fair market value of the miscellaneous

buildings is far less than $15 million);

 

(b) another corporation (F) that manages the Real

Estate of E, and derives revenues in management fees

from E for managing the Real Estate;

 

(c) another corporation (G) that holds beneficial

interests in mortgages on the Real Estate.

 

A now proposes to sell to X, for a purchase price in excess of $15 million, (a) the securities of Cthat it owns, and (b) certain contract rights incidental to the ownership of the Real Estate. A and X meet the size of the parties test.

It is our belief that the transaction is not reportable, under the [note 1] Commissions informal interpretations of 7A(c)(1) of the Act and 802.1 of the Regulations. This is essentially an acquisition of office buildings and assets incident thereto. To the extent that the real estate in question consists of something other than classic office buildings, it consists of post-offices, which may be analogized most closely to office buildings.

I would appreciate your advice as to whether your office concurs with this view.

Thank you.

Very truly your,

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.