Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(4)
Staff
Eric Elmore
Response/Comments
10/8/91-talked to (redacted). Advised that I was not speaking for the Commission but only for the PMN Office, which advice was not binding on the Commission. I agreed that, since the RTC was approving and supervising the sale, and was the receiver for the UPE, the(c)(4) exemption applied.

Question

October 4, 1991


 

Premerger Notification Office

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303

Washington, D.C. 20580

Attention: Mr. Eric Elmore

 

Re: Exemption from HSR Pre-Merger Notification and Waiting

Period Requirements in Connection with the Purchase of

Voting Securities of (redacted)

 

Dear Mr. Elmore:

We represent, respectively, (redacted) and (redacted) has agreed to sell (redacted) all of the outstanding voting and other securities of (redacted) for a cash purchase price of (redacted) million, subject to certain adjustment at closing. (Redacted) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of (redacted) and (redacted) is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of (redacted) as described in the attached organizational chart. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), is the receiver for (redacted) and has approved the sale by (redacted) to (redacted) The proposed transaction is further described in the copy of the Stock Purchase Agreement which is enclosed herewith, and is at times referred to herein as the Proposed Transaction.

You and (redacted) discussed whether the Proposed Transaction exempt from the reporting requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the Act). Section 7A(c)(4) of the Act exempts transfers to or from a from a federal agency. You have advised us that it is the position of the Federal Trade Commission that this exemption will apply to the Proposed Transaction if the RTC reviews and approves the transaction. We have been advised that the Proposed Transaction has been reviewed and approved by the RTC at various district, regional and national levels.

The members of the Board of Directors of (redacted) consist of RTC employees who were required to obtain approval and authorization form the RTC to vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction. Because of the size of the purchase price or the Proposed Transaction and of the amount of (redacted) assets and net revenues, such approval to vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction had to be, and was, given by (1) the RTC Consolidated Field Office Credit Committee in Tampa, Florida, (2) the RTC Regional Senior Credit Review Committee in Atlanta, Georgia, (3) the RTC Committee on Management and Disposition of Assets in Washington, D.C., and (4) the RTC Senior Committee on Management and Disposition of Assets in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, the RTC in its capacity as receiver of (redacted) has indemnified (redacted) with respect to certain aspects of the Proposed Transaction and this undertaking has been guaranteed by the RTC in its corporate capacity. Copies of those agreements are also enclosed.

It is our understanding that you will telephone the undersigned to confirm that it is the Federal Trade Commissions position that the exemption provided by Section 7A(c)(4) of the Act applies to the Proposed Transaction as described in this letter. We look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience, as the parties will not close the Proposed Transaction until we receive your confirmation of the exemption. We would appreciate if you will file-stamp each of the enclosed additional copies of this letter and return both copies in the Federal Express envelope provided.

Thank you very much for your assistance, and please feel free to contact either of the undersigned should you wish any further information about the Proposed Transaction or the parties.

Very truly yours,


(redacted)

Encl.

Cc:Mr. John Sipple, Jr.

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.