Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.1(f)(1)
Staff
Richard Smith
Response/Comments
6/16/94-called writer and advised that the conclusions reached in this letter were correct.(The writer had previously informed me that there were no avoidance intent behind the manner in which this deal was structured but rather, that its complex structure was driven by a variety of tax considerations.)

Question

June 13, 1994

Richard Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Acquisition of Partnership Interest

Dear Mr. Smith:

I am writing to follow up on the various telephone conversations we have had regarding the above-referenced subject, and particularly our discussion of today, June 13.

We represent a person involved in a transaction which, if consummated, will be structured as follows:

The stockholders of Corporation A will form a new company, Corporation B. They will contribute cash to Corporation B, and receive shares in he same proportions as they own shares of Corporation A. In other words, Corporation A and corporation B will be held by the same people, in the same percentages. The formation of B will not be a reportable event.

A and B will then form Partnership. B will contribute a not insignificant amount of cash, and receive a 1% interest in Partnership. Corporation A will contribute its entire business - - fixed assets, intangibles, liabilities, goodwill, etc. - - and receive a 99% interest in Partnership. The contributions of A and B will be roughly proportionate to the interests in Partnership they acquire. At this point in time the 99% interest in Partnership will be As sole asset. Similarly, the 1% interest will be Bs sole asset.

Immediately after Partnership is formed and funded, Corporation X will acquire a 50% interest in Partnership from A (leaving A with 49%) and a 1% interest in Partnership from B (leaving B with nothing). Corporation X will then own a 51% interest in Partnership, and will have effective control of Partnerships assets. Corporation b will be dissolved.

All of these events will occur at a single closing. Conceptually they will occur seriatim, but for all practical purposes they will take place simultaneously.

It is our understanding that the above-described transaction is not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, even though it meets the size-of-the parties and size-of-the transaction tests of the Act. We understand that the formation of a bona fide partnership is never a reportable transaction. We also understand that, in the view of the Pre-Merger Notification Office, acquisition of a bona fide partnership interest of less than 100% is neither an acquisition of voting securities not an acquisition of assets, for purposes of pre-merger notification requirements, and thus is not reportable. Finally, we understand that, if at some time in the future Corporation X acts to acquire 100% ownership will be reportable.

I would appreciate receiving your informal opinion as whether, based on the facts as set forth in this letter, our understanding is correct. I appreciate your cooperation, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Very truly yours,

(Redacted)

(Redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.