Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.2 (a) & (b)
Staff
Richard Smith
File Number
9802021
Response/Comments
3/2/98- Advised writer that if it is certain that A (not C) will control LP after completion of transaction, A should file as an acquiring person (by controlling LP) and B should file as acquired person. If C ends up controlling LP, then it must file as an acquiring person.

Question

(redacted)

VIA FACSIMILE

February 27, 1998


Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Compliance with Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (theAct)


Dear Dick:


One of our clients is planning to undertake a series of transactions, at least two of which will require a filing under the Act. The purpose of my letter is a seek guidance from the Premerger Notification Office regarding how to report the proposed transactions. These transactions will happen one right after the other on the same closing date. The proposed transactions are illustrated on the attached pages. As the first and second steps, a corporation (A-1), which is wholly-owned by A, and a limited liability company (LLC), which is wholly-owned by A-1 will transfer the assets from two wholly-owned subsidiaries of B (B-1 and B-2). As the next steps, A-1 will transfer the assets it just acquired to a newly formed shell corporation (Sub), which is wholly-owned by a limited partnership (LP) in which A-1 has a 40% interest and C has a 60% interest and A-1 will transfer its membership interest in LLC to that same limited partnership. As a result of these transfers by A-1 to Sub and LP, A-1's limited partnership interest in LP will be increased from 40% to 60%.


A, B and C will satisfy the size of person test of the Act. The value of the assets which A-1 is to acquire from B-1 is less than $15 million but the value of the assets which LLC is to acquire from B-2 exceeds $15 million. Thus, in combination the aggregate assets to be acquired by entities controlled by A from entities controlled by B exceed $15 million. LLC has significant assets in addition to the more than $15 million of assets to be acquired from B-2. Sub will be a shell corporation until its acquisition of assets from A-1.


A is planning on filing a single Premerger Notification and Report Form and Paying a [no] single filing fee with respect to A-1's and LLCs asset acquisitions from B-1 and B-2. We are unclear, however, as o whether an additional filing is necessary for the transfers contemplated to LP and Sub. While C currently controls LP and Sub, after completion of the last steps in the transaction, A will control LP and Sub. since LP is a limited partnership, A-1's increase in partnership interest from 40% to 60% should not be reportable. Thus, while LP and Sub are acquiring the assets immediately after they have been acquired by the A entities from B entities, the ultimate parent entity of the acquiring persons (LP and Sub) and the acquired persons (A - 1 and LLC) will be the same (i.e. A) at the end of the transaction (although not at the beginning). It strikes me that to make C file for the acquisitions from the A entities to be made by LP and Sub does not make sense when A rather than C will control LP and Sub after the transaction is completed.


Please telephone me at (redacted) after you have had the opportunity to review this letter, and let me know the Premerger Notification Offices position regarding As filing requirements under the Act for these transactions.


Very truly yours,

(redacted)






Note: 2 pages of graphics

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.