Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
9012007
Response/Comments
I concur, called 12/12/90

Question

(redacted)


Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Voting Agreement/Control

Dear Patrick :

This confirms our conversation this morning regarding calculating control. After your consultation with Dick Smith and John Sipple, the Federal Trade Commissions staff has concluded that where a shareholders voting agreement give irrevocable proxies to two individuals, the number of voting securities represented by the proxies are not aggregated with either of the individuals shareholdings to determine the number or percentage of voting securities held by that individual. Moreover, the voting securities represented by the proxies are also not aggregated to either of the individuals shareholdings for purposes of determining whether the individuals have the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the directors of a corporation.


In our situation, each of the individuals hold between 14% to 15% of the voting securities of the corporation and since no other individual or entity holds 50% or more of the voting securities of the corporation or has the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the directors of the corporation, the corporation itself will be its own ultimate parent entity.


Very truly yours




cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.