Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.2(e); 802.2(f)
Staff
Nancy Ovuka
File Number
9902008
Response/Comments
Transaction is exempt under 802.2(e) and (f).

Question

(redacted)

February 23, 1999

Nancy Ovuka
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: Nonreportability of Transaction

Dear Nancy:

This letter will confirm our conversations during the last few weeks regarding the nonreportability of the following transaction under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act ("HSR Act"), as codified at 15 U.S.C. Section 18a, and the rules promulgated (hereunder:

Company A is the concessioner under a 30 year concessions contract with a governmental entity that provides it with the right to operate hotel facilities and provide related services on specified land within a national park. The concessions contract will expire on December 31, 2002. Company A operates two hotels and other improvements on the land and holds a "possessory interest"(1) in the buildings and improvements. In the event that the government does not renew the concession contract. the contract and federal statutory (16 U.S.C. 20e) provisions provide that the government will pay the concessioner (or the concessioner's successor, as the case may be) the fair value of the buildings and improvements, as determined by the majority vote of a board of three appraisers. Each hotel contains a restaurant as well.

Outside the park, on land owned by Company A, is a golf course. The golf course contains a pro shop and a restaurant.

Company A also owns a campground consisting of heated cabins that are rented on terms similar to that of a hotel and recreational vehicle facilities. The value of the campground is approximately $5 million, of which a significant portion is attributable to the cabins.

Company B proposes acquiring all of Company q's interests in the hotel, golf course, and campground, including the ancillary operations, for total consideration of approximately $50 million. There is no premium being being paid to Company A for the value of the concession contract.(2)

Please let me know immediately if I have in anyway misunderstood your advise regarding the nonreportability of the above transaction. As always, I appreciate your prompt and courteous advice. Best regards.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

1. A possessory interest can be pledged as security, may be transferred as part of a transfer of a concessions contract, is not extinguished by contract expiration or termination, and may not be taken for public use without just compensation. 2. In addition, Company B will be acquiring from Company A a public utility company that services Company A's facilities and adjacent residential properties, a supermarket, and three gasoline stations that combined are valued at under $5 million. Although these assets are non-exempt for HSR Act purposes, they are well below the size-of-transaction threshold.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.