Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Victor Cohen
File Number
8906005
Response/Comments
Exempt under 802.1, not (c)(1)

Question

(redacted)

Victor Cohen
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washing ton, D.C. 20580

Dear Victor Cohen:


We spoke on Wednesday about the need for filing a premerger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 (the Act) in connection with the proposed purchase of an office building and an adjacent parking garage by a partnership managed by one of our clients. In order to confirm in writing the matters we discussed in our telephone conversation, I will outline the proposed transaction and my understanding of the Premerger Notification Offices interpretation.


Description of Transaction


The proposed transaction involves the sale of assets consisting of an office building and a parking garage in downtown (redacted) by Company A to a newly formed partnership which is controlled (within the meaning of 801.1(b) of the rules adopted pursuant to the Act) by Company B. The total sale price will be in excess of $15 million but less than $25 million.


Company A is a large (redacted) company with numerous direct investments in real estate and Company B is a (redacted) subsidiary of a diversified conglomerate. Both companies are regularly involved in the purchase and sale of office building for investment purposes.


For purposed of this discussion we will assume that the parties meet the commerce test and the size of the parties test impose by the Act.


The office building does contain some retail office space, but its value is less than $15 million. I understand from our conversation that the current staff interpretation is that a parking lot or garage does not constitute retail office space for purposes of determining whether a filing is required under the Act.


Hart-Scott-Rodino Analysis


It is my understanding after our telephone conversation that no notification is required under the Act for the proposed transaction described above. This is because the Premerger Notification Office currently takes the position that the Ordinary Course of Business Exemption, 15 U.S.C. 18a(c)(1), applies to the sale of office buildings between parties regularly engaged in the ownership of such properties which contain less than $15 million in value of retail space.


Given the facts as outlined above and our telephone conversation in this regard, we have concluded that no filing it necessary. We would appreciate confirmation from you of this conclusion. If you need further information, please call the undersigned at (redacted).


Thank you for your assistance in this matter.


Sincerely,



cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.