Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.63
Staff
Nancy Ovuka

Question

[redacted]

September 12, 2000

Ms. Nancy Ovuka

Premerger Notification Office

Bureau of Competition, Room 303

Federal Trade Commission

6th Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washing ton, D.C. 20580

Dear Ms. Ovuka:

The purpose of this correspondence is to confirm our recent discussion concerning the treatment of a specific synthetic lease financing arrangement.

As discussed, we represent a client (to be referred to herein as "Company A") which is entering into a synthetic lease financing agreement with respect to a series of retail sites. Under the arrangements contemplated, Company A will enter into contracts to acquire either (i) land on which retail facilities are to be constructed or (ii) existing retail facilities. Prior to closing, the contractual rights will be assigned to a newly established special purpose trust (the "Trust"), the settlor of which is a commercial bank ("Bank A") as agent for a group of lending banks including Bank A, and the beneficiaries of which are the lending institutions including Bank A. The trustee of the Trust is a separate financial institution. The Trust (or trustee as appropriate in certain contexts) then acquires the real property in question and leases it to Company A. the acquisition of the property by the Trust (the "Acquisition") is financed by the lending institutions, The Trust also obtains construction financing for the unimproved land from the lending institutions and under an agency agreement authorizes Company A to build retail facilities on those sites, with the construction funding again coming from the lending institutions.

For each retail site, the lease period for the real property and related retail facility (the "Lease") will be approximately five years. During the term of the lease, the title to the real property is held by the Trust and Company A has sole use of the property and retail facility as lessee under the terms of the lease. Company A makes rental payments to the Trust which are generally equivalent to the amount of interest owned by the Trust on the loans from the lending institutions, At the end of the lease period, Company A has the option to purchase the properties (a "Purchase"). If a decision is made by Company A to purchase the properties, the purchase price is generally equivalent to the principal owned on the loans obtained by the Trust from the lending institutions (plus related transaction and interest costs). Alternatively, subject to agreement by the lending institutions to extend their financing arrangements with the Trust, Company A could renew the Lease. If Company A neither purchases the property nor renews the Lease, the Trust could sell the properties and in the process pay off the loans and Company A would be responsible for covering any deficiencies.

If you or your colleagues should disagree with the conclusion expressed herein, I would appreciate it if you would please let me know as soon as possible by contacting me .

Thank you for your assistance in connections with this matter.

Sincerely yours,

[redacted]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.