Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(a)(2), 801.1(a)(3)
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
No written comments

Question

(redacted)

September 24, 1984

Mr. Wayne Kaplan
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 301
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

This letter will serve to confirm our telephone conversation of September 21, 1984, relating to the application of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.

The acquiring entity in this case is a limited partnership, not engaged in manufacturing, which itself has both total assets and annual net sales of less than $100,000,000. However, if its general partner is included within the defined term person its total assets will be greater than $100,000,000.

You confirmed that limited partnerships are treated, under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, as their own ultimate parent entities, making the general partner thereof not included within the term person. therefore, as the person being acquired also has both total assets and annual net sales of less than $100,000,000, it is our understanding that the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act will not apply to this transaction.

You stated that there was no method available by which you can confirm in writing your offices interpretation of the statute. You advised that we write this letter, stating that we would rely on the interpretation of the Act which is described herein if we did not hear otherwise from you within two weeks. Therefore, we will so rely on this interpretation if we do not hear otherwise from you by October 8, 1984.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.