Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A; 801.1
Staff
H. Rubenstein
Response/Comments
(redacted) says Bank also has Visa and Mastercard. Bank may or may not exit private label credit card business. Customer lists already belong to A. Transaction is exempt as ordinary course of business and under $15MM (size of transaction).

Question

October 30, 1991


 

Hy David Rubenstein, Esquire

Premerger Notification Office

Room 323

Federal Trade Commission

6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20580

 

Dear Hy:

I am writing to confirm the substance of my telephone conversation with you this morning. You advised me that under the following circumstances, the parties (Company A and Bank B) would not have to file premerger notification forms under Hart-Scott-Rodino. You also told me that unless I hear otherwise from you within three days, we may assume that your advice reflects the position of the Premerger Notification Office.

Company A operates a number of retail stores. Customers at these stores may charge their purchases to a national credit card (e.g., MasterCard or Visa) or to As own private label credit cards. In 1978 A contracted with Bank B for B to run As private label credit card operations. Among other things, B decides who may have a credit card and what their credit lines will be, processes the transactions, bills the customers, and pursues collections.

A would like to resume processing its own credit card transactions, and earn the very substantial attendant profits for itself. Under the contract, however, A would have to give B 3 years notice before terminating the contract, and would have to pay a termination penalty of approximately $21 million. Moreover, during the 3 years, B would likely earn another $80 million of profit on As credit card business.

B processes the private label credit cards of a number of firms in addition to A. For its own reasons, B is interested in leaving this business, and offered to sell its entire private label credit card business to A. A declined this offer. A only wants to process its own credit cards.

A and B are now negotiating an early termination of their contract. B has offered to sell A the lease for the facility where B now does its private label credit card processing and the equipment there. A is interested in acquiring that lease** and equipment, and in hiring Bs employees at the facility. A estimates that it would cost about $10 million to establish a new facility for processing its private label credit cards.

** staff edit: for less than $10MM

A and B both meet the size-of-person test under Hart-Scott-Rodino. A will pay B more than $70 million to cancel the contract and acquire the processing facility.

Please call me, at (redacted) if you need additional information, or have any other questions. I thank you again for your cooperation and assistance.

Best regards.

Sincerely,


 

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.