Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(a)(c)(8); 801.10(b); 802.20
Staff
Richard Smith
Response/Comments
See File # 9510002

Question

October 5, 1995

Mr. Richard Smith
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: (redacted) Request for Opinion Regarding Filing Under Hart-Scott-Rodino Act

Dear Mr. Smith:

Thank you for your telephone call today in response to my letter of October 2, 1995. Your informal interpretation, responding to our request for an informal confirmation of our conclusion, was that filing would not have to be made under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act for the transaction described in our letter.

You asked me questions during our conversation and this will confirm that none of the entities described in the letter of October 2 are engaged in manufacturing, as that term is defined in the statutes and regulations governing the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. No entity or individual owns a 50% or greater interest in any of the entities described in our letter, and neither do the entities own a 50% or greater interest in any other entity. Also, this will confirm that the fair market value of the assets of (redacted) excluding liabilities, are more than $10 million but less than $15 million.

Thank you for your prompt response to our letter.

Yours very truly.

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.