Skip to main content
Date
Rule
Unknown
Staff
John Sipple
Response/Comments
See below

Question

December 24, 1985

John M. Sipple, Jr., Esquire
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 303
Federal Trade Commission
Sixth Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear John:

This letter will serve to memorialize your oral opinion, provided over the telephone today, that the proposed transaction between (redacted) outlined in my letter hand delivered to you early this morning, does not give rise to any reporting obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification program. Thank you for getting back to us so quickly.

Best wishes for the holidays.

Cordially,

(redacted)

NO STAFF COMMENTS

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.

Return to top