Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(a)(2)
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
8912003
Response/Comments
If city is municipal corporation, isnt the city, the corporation and [sic] entity and therefore the UPE? Yes (redacted) called and said she used the term corporation loosely and that in fact the city was not a corporation.

Question

(redacted)

December 6, 1989

VIA HAND DELIVERY


Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Premerger Office
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:16 CFR 801.01(a)(2)[sic] - Exemption of Foreign Governments from Entity


Dear Mr. Sharpe:


This is to confirm our telephone conversation of November 29, 1989.


Our client, Company A, a non-U.S. industrial corporation, is negotiating a joint venture for the United States with Company B, another non-U.S. industrial corporation. The contemplated transaction will be reportable under the Antitrust Improvements Act.


The issue we discussed on the telephone deals with the determination of ultimate parent entity in respect of A.

1.Facts: Substantially all (more than 90%) of As outstanding shares are owned by a foreign city, a municipal corporation, existing under the laws of a foreign country. The foreign city holds As shares in a separate, segregated fund identified by the name of As founder and entitled [Founders name] Foundation. This foundation is not a legal entity separate and apart from the city, but the income from this fund is earmarked solely for charitable eleemosynary and public purposes within the city.

2.Conclusion: After consulting with Richard Smith, we concluded that the ultimate parent entity in this case is A and not the city which owns A. This conclusion is based upon Section 801.1(a)(2) of the Commissions Rules which exempt from the definition of the term entity any foreign state, foreign government or agency thereof.


In reporting the contemplated transaction on behalf of A we intend to rely on the foregoing interpretation of the Commissions Rules.


Very truly yours,


(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.