Skip to main content

Displaying 81 - 100 of 6021

Square One Development Group Inc., et al., U.S. and State of Wisconsin v.

The U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, and the Wisconsin Attorney General, filed suit against Consumer Law Protection and related companies, along with their owners and operators, Christopher Carroll, George Reed, Louann Reed, Scott Jackson, and Eduardo Balderas for scamming consumers—mostly older adults—out of more than $90 million in a massive timeshare exit scam.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2123065
Case Status
Pending

NERD Solutions

In April 2026, the FTC obtained a temporary restraining order against alleged student loan debt relief scheme NERD Solutions and its operators over allegations they pretended to be affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or loan servicers and falsely promised student loan debt relief that did not exist in exchange for illegal upfront fees.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

Forever Living Products International, LLC, et al., FTC v.

Forever Living will be permanently prohibited from making deceptive earnings claims to resolve Federal Trade Commission allegations that the company deceived consumers that they could earn profits from the venture when the vast majority of participants made little or no money.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

Wellington, FTC v.

The FTC alleged that Stormy Wellington used deceptive earnings claims to recruit new members to two multilevel marketing companies.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3093
Case Status
Pending

StubHub Holdings, FTC v.

In April 2026, the FTC announced that StubHub, the nation’s largest ticket exchange and resale ticket provider, will pay $10 million to settle charges that the company violated the FTC Act and the agency’s Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees by deceptively advertising ticket prices on its website without clearly and conspicuously disclosing up-front how much consumers actually would pay, including all mandatory fees. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
252 3117
Case Status
Under Order

FTC Publishes New Strategic Plan

Date
The Federal Trade Commission has published its FY 2026-2030 Strategic Plan, which will guide the agency over the next five years. The new plan lays out the agency’s mission, vision, and goals and...

Lindsay Chevrolet, et al, FTC and State of Maryland v

 The FTC and Maryland Attorney General charged Lindsay Automotive Group with systematically deceiving and overcharging car-buying consumers for years, costing them millions of dollars in junk fees and unwanted add-on products.

In December 2024, the FTC and Maryland Attorney General charged Lindsay Automotive Group with systematically deceiving and overcharging car-buying consumers for years, costing them millions of dollars in junk fees and unwanted add-on products. In March 2026 the FTC announced a settlement in the case in which the defendants will pay full refunds and additional penalties to redress defrauded consumers.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2323032
Case Status
Pending