Displaying 8381 - 8400 of 9351
Informal Hearing on Proposed Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses
Look who’s covered: the amended TSR and tech support scams
Getting to the bottom line: The FTC’s bipartisan Junk Fees Rule and your business
How To Bring National Consumer Protection Week to Your Library
Paying to get paid: gamified job scams drive record losses
Superior Servicing, LLC., FTC v.
The Federal Trade Commission has stopped a scheme that allegedly bilked millions of dollars out of consumers burdened with student loan debt by pretending to be affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education in violation of the FTC’s Impersonation Rule, collecting illegal advance fees, and making other deceptive claims.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada entered a temporary restraining order on November 22, 2024 and a preliminary injunction against corporate defendant Superior Servicing on December 6, 2024.
The Federal Trade Commission filed an amended complaint adding corporate defendants Sunrise Solutions USA LLC, Alumni Advantage LLC, Student Processing Center Group LLC, SPCTWO LLC, Accredit LLC and individual defendants Eric Caldwell and David Hernandez.
As holiday shopping begins, the FTC and IRS agree: scams and identity theft are always bad for business
Unpacking Real Time Bidding through FTC’s case on Mobilewalla
Identity Theft and College Students
Facebook, Docket No. C-4365 Oral Argument Before the Commission (Hybrid) - November 12, 2024
Qargo Coffee, Inc., et al., FTC v.
The Federal Trade Commission has taken action against coffee shop franchise Qargo Coffee and its founders for failing to disclose critical information required by the Franchise Rule, including one founder’s ties to burger franchise BurgerIM, leaving prospective franchisees in the dark when deciding whether to invest in the franchise.
In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Qargo and founders Mark Bastorous, Bernadette Bastorous, and Samir Shenouda violated the FTC’s Franchise Rule—the agency’s second case in recent years alleging violations of the Franchise Rule.
Under proposed order, the company and its founders are required to pay $30,000, provide franchisees the right to rescind contracts, and void noncompete agreements.
Click to Cancel: The FTC’s amended Negative Option Rule and what it means for your business
National Automobile Dealers Association, et al. v. FTC
Mark your calendars, telemarketers and sellers! October 15 is the Telemarketing Sales Rule’s Record Store Day.
Office Hours for Librarians - January 7, 2025
Office Hours for Librarians - November 7, 2024
How To Bring National Consumer Protection Week to Your Library
How to Help Your Library Patrons Avoid Holiday Scams
Displaying 8381 - 8400 of 9351