Displaying 121 - 140 of 177
FTC Charges Physician Groups With Price Fixing
Health Care Alliance of Laredo, L.C., In the Matter of
Texas Doctors' IPA Agrees to Settle Price Fixing Charges
Commission Finds That North Texas Specialty Physicians Illegally Fixed Prices
Partners Health Network, Inc., In the Matter of
Announced Action for September 20, 2005
White Sands Health Care System, L.L.C.; et al., In the Matter of
South Carolina Physician-hospital Organization Agrees To Settle Physician Price-fixing Charges
Announced Action for July 5, 2005
Announced Actions for June 17, 2005
New Millennium Orthopaedics, LLC; et al., In the Matter of
The Commission settled charges with two small groups of orthopedic physicians in the Cincinnati area that had formed an independent practice association that jointly negotiated contracts regarding the rates its physician members would charge health plans and other payors for their services. In addition to the usual prohibitions on joint negotiations, the Commission’s order disbanded the IPA and prohibited future collective bargaining.
Announced Actions for May 20, 2005
Northwest New Mexico Physicians Agree to Settle FTC Charges That They Fixed Prices
FTC Halts Physician Price-Fixing in Cincinnati Area
Announced Actions for April 19, 2005
Preferred Health Services, Inc., In the Matter of
The order prohibits Preferred Health Services from orchestrating collective agreements and other terms for physician services when negotiating with health insurance plans and other third party payers. According to the complaint these agreements among the physician-hospital organization of doctors and the Oconee Memorial Hospital in northwestern South Carolina to collectively negotiate fees and terms of services could lead to higher health care costs and limited physician access.
Chicago-Area Physicians Group Agrees Not to Fix Prices
California Pacific Medical Group, Inc., In the Matter of
With an administrative complaint issued on July 8, 2003 the Commission charged a San Francisco, California physicians’ organization with engaging in an agreement under which its competing members agreed collectively on the price and other terms on which they would enter into contracts with health plans or other third party payers. The complaint also alleged that Brown and Toland directed its physicians to end their preexisting contracts with payers and required its physician members to charge specified prices in all Preferred Provider Organization contracts. A final consent order prohibits Brown and Toland from negotiating with payers on behalf of physicians, refusing to deal with payers, and setting terms for physicians to deal with payers, unless the physicians are clinically or financially integrated.
South Carolina Doctors Group Barred from Fixing Prices
Displaying 121 - 140 of 177