Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Hannaford Bros. Company
Federal Loan Modification Law Center, LLP, et al.
Debt Consultants of America, Inc. and Debt Professionals of America, Inc., et al.
Bisaro, Paul
Financial Freedom Processing, Inc., formerly known as Financial Freedom of America, Inc., et al.
Preliminary FTC Staff Privacy Report
Statement of the Commission, In the Matter of Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rosch, In the Matter of Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Reverb Communications, Inc.
In Deep Services, Inc., a California corporation, also d/b/a Grants For You Now, et al.
Pilot Corporation, Propeller Corp., and Flying J Inc., In the Matter of
The FTC required Pilot Corporation, owner of the largest travel center network in the United States, to sell 26 locations as part of a settlement that will replace the competition lost because of Pilot’s proposed $1.8 billion acquisition of Flying J Inc.’s travel center network. Pilot has agreed to sell the travel centers, which provide diesel, food, parking, and other amenities for truckers, to Love’s Travel Stops and Country Stores, the smallest national travel center operator, currently concentrated in the South. According to the FTC’s complaint, the deal would have reduced competition for certain long-haul trucking fleets for which Pilot and Flying J were the first and second best choices for diesel.
Rite Aid Corporation, In the Matter of
Rite Aid is prohibited from using facial recognition technology for security or surveillance purposes for five years to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the retailer failed to implement reasonable procedures and prevent harm to consumers in its use of facial recognition technology in hundreds of stores.
The order requires Rite Aid to implement comprehensive safeguards to prevent these types of harm to consumers when deploying automated systems that use biometric information to track them or flag them as security risks. It also requires Rite Aid to discontinue using any such technology if it cannot control potential risks to consumers. To settle charges it violated a 2010 Commission data security order by failing to adequately oversee its service providers, Rite Aid is also required to implement a robust information security program, which must be overseen by the company’s top executives.