Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.9
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree

Question

[redacted]

May 30, 2000

BY FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL

Mr. Michael Verne

Premerger Notification Office

Bureau of Competition, Room 303

Federal Trade Commission

6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20580

Re: HSR Advice

Dear Mike:

I am writing to confirm to the advice you gave to me during our telephone conversation on May 16, 2000. The hypothetical and questions I posed to you and your conclusions are described below. Partnership ("P") holds less than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of Issuer (the "Target"). P is its own ultimate parent entity. The general partner of P is a limited liability company ("LLC"). LLC has managing members ("MMs") and non-managing members ("NMMs"). A NMM of LLC, NMM1, sits on the board of the Target. NMM1 may unilaterally provide shareholder approval vis-a-vis P for actions requiring Target shareholder approval. NMM1 also may make recommendations of LLC that P make additional investments in Target or sell off some of its holdings in Target. As a practical matter, LLC will follow these kinds of recommendations by NMM1 although technically the MMs of LLC can overrule any recommendations by NMM1. For reporting purposes under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, however, NMM1 reports that he may be deemed to share voting and investment power of P's shares in Target.

P is planning to acquire additional shares of Target voting securities. I asked you whether the facts described above preclude P from utilizing the passive investor exemption assuming P were to continue to hold 10% or less of the outstanding securities of Target. You indicated that the facts described above would not preclude P from utilizing the passive investor exemption so long as P otherwise meets the requirements of the exemption and so long as NMM1 is not entitled to at least 50% of the profits or assets of LLC or P.

Please call me to confirm that my understanding of your conclusions as described above is accurate. As always, thanks for your help.

Sincerely,

[redacted]

[redacted]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.