Legal Library: Search

The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.

Displaying 20061 - 20080 of 45060

Show:

Sort By:

Federal Register Notice

Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes or at Certain Other Locations - 16 CFR Part 429

Date

July 27, 2009

Federal Register Notice

Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc., Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment

Date

July 27, 2009

Early Termination Notices

20090558: Verizon Communications Inc.; AT&T Inc.

Date

July 24, 2009

Acquiring Party

Verizon Communications Inc.

Acquired Party

AT&T Inc.

Acquired Entities

Newco LLC

Federal Register Notice

Aspen Technology, Inc. Analysis to Aid Public Comment on Proposed Agreement Containing Order to Show Cause and Order Modifying Order

Date

July 24, 2009

Cases and Proceedings

Warshak, Steve; Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., Lifekey, Inc., Warner Health Care, Inc., and Wagner Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al.

Type of Action

Federal

Last Updated

July 22, 2009

FTC Matter/File Number

042 3003

HSR Informal Interpretations

0907016 Informal Interpretation

Date

July 22, 2009

Rule

801.2

07/22/2009 1. Agree this is not reportable under the continuum theory. 2. I think you meant the new UPE of Company A would file as the acquired person. That is correct. 3. Yes -any acquisition of...

Original Image File (438.98 KB)

Cases and Proceedings

Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al.

Type of Action

Federal

Last Updated

July 22, 2009

FTC Matter/File Number

042 3003

Cases and Proceedings

AMP Publications, Inc., et al.

Type of Action

Federal

Last Updated

July 22, 2009

FTC Matter/File Number

X000025

HSR Informal Interpretations

0907014 Informal Interpretation

Date

July 22, 2009

Rule

15 USC 18a(c)(1) 7A(c)(1)

Agree.

Original Image File (375.09 KB)

HSR Informal Interpretations

0907017 Informal Interpretation

Date

July 22, 2009

Rule

802.51

any acquisition of Newco voting securities by shareholders of A and B would have a potential filing obligation. (c)(10) and 802.10 would not exempt these, but 802.9 might.

Original Image File (71.07 KB)

Testimony