Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(c)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree, The first potentially reportable event would be the purchase of 100% interest in the portfolio. (N. Ovuka, T. Hancock and R. Smith concur)

Question

[redacted]

October 3, 2000

VIA FACSIMILE

Michael Verne

Premerger Notification

Office Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

7th & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washing ton, D.C. 20580

Dear Mike:

I am writing to confirm my understanding of telephone conversations we had on September 28, 2000 and September 29, 2000 concerning the potential reportability under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act ("HSR") of a proposed transaction discussed below.

As we discussed, our client, Corporation A, intends to enter into an agreement ("Agreement") with Corporation B relating to an intellectual property portfolio ("Intellectual Property Portfolio") currently owned by Corporation B.

In consideration of rights and options granted to Corporation A under the Agreement, upon execution of the Agreement, Corporation A will make a payment of $13 million to Corporation B, and within sixty days of this Agreement will make a payment of $500,000. In addition, within thirty days of the issuance of a certain patent. Corporation A, upon written notice by Corporation B, will pay Corporation B $5 million, fifty percent of which will be a credit against the purchase price for the possible purchase, discussed below, of the second fifty percent interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio. Further, at the end of each twelve month period until Corporation A purchases some ownership interest in intellectual property from Corporation B. Corporation A will make a payment to corporation B of approximately $800,000. I collectively refer to above payments as the "Initial Payments." The Initial Payment will be made regardless of whether Corporation A purchases an ownership interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio.

The options and rights Corporation A will be receiving at the point of executing the Agreement are as follows. First, no later than ten days after the issuance of the first patent in Corporation B's Intellectual Property Portfolio with an acceptable claim ("Acceptable Claim")1, Corporation A shall purchase from Corporation B for $37.5 million a fifty percent interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio. However, if an Acceptable Claim does not ever issue, Corporation A has no obligation to purchase a fifty percent interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio. Second, for a period of six months after the issuance of the first payment with an Acceptable Claim, or with prior written notice, Corporation A has an option to purchase the other 50% of the Intellectual Property Portfolio for a purchase price of approximately $43.5 million.

The rights acquired by Corporation A at the point of executing the Agreement include the right to file and prosecute certain patent applications owned by Corporation B although these applications shall be filed, prosecuted and maintained in Corporation B's name and Corporation B shall be consulted in the process. Corporation A may acquire ownership of the applications and the underlying intellectual property if it acquires Corporation B's Intellectual Property Portfolio pursuant to the options and rights discussed above.

If, at the time if the issuance of the last patent in the Intellectual Property Portfolio, none of the parents contain an Acceptable Claim, and Corporation A has not elected to purchase an interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio, Corporation A shall purchase an ownership interest in some intellectual property owned by Corporation B, to be agreed upon by the parties, for a purchase price of $12.5 million.

You concluded that the making of Initial Payment from Corporation A to Corporation B in advance of the acquisition of a beneficial ownership interest in Corporation B's intellectual property does not necessitate first conducting an HSR filing even assuming the size of the parties test is met. You confirmed that the rights discussed above to acquire 50% or 100% of the Intellectual Property Portfolio should be deemed options since there is no certainty that Corporation A will acquire or be obligated to acquire the first fifty percent interest in the Intellectual Property Portfolio, and there is no obligation for Corporation A to acquire the second fifty percent interest in any event. You also ,confirmed that the acquisition of the options and rights does not constitute the acquisition of beneficial ownership in Corporations B's intellectual property.

You also confirmed that the Initial Payment would not be deemed to be paying consideration for a potentially HSR reportable asset acquisition because Corporation A will not necessarily require any ownership interest in Corporation B's Intellectual property Portfolio in despite making the payments. You further confirmed that this would still be the case even though at the time of the issuance of the last patent in the Intellectual Property Portfolio in none of the patents contain an Acceptable Claim, and Corporation A is required to purchase from Corporation B an ownership interest in some intellectual property owned by Corporation B, to be agreed upon by the parties, for a purchase price of $12.5 million. You noted that separate consideration was being paid for this ownership interest.

Please let ne know as soon as possible if you disagree with any of the conclusions discussed above, or if I have misunderstood any aspect of your advice. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,

[redacted]

1 Corporation A must prior to a certain time designate in writing what claims it deems to be Acceptable Claims, or subsequently may designate in writing what claims are Acceptable Claims with Corporation B's consent.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.