United Healthcare Services Inc. v. Gilead Sciences Inc., et al. (In re HIV)
Date
Citation Number
24-1585
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
CoStar Group v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange
Date
Citation Number
23-55662
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brief for Amicus Curiae Federal Trade Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya in Support of Defendant-Appellant
Date
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jones v. Google
Date
Citation Number
No. 21-16281
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In this amicus brief, the FTC argues that the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) does not preempt state laws that are consistent with COPPA’s treatment of regulated activities. The...
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. City of Seattle, et al.
Date
Citation Number
17-35640
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brief of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, urging the Ninth Circuit to reject application of the state action doctrine to this case because the "clear...
St. Luke's Health System, Ltd, and Saltzer Medical Group, P.A.
The FTC, together with the Idaho Attorney General, filed a complaint in federal district court seeking to block St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.’s acquisition of Idaho's largest independent, multi-specialty physician practice group, Saltzer Medical Group P.A. According to the joint complaint, the combination of St. Luke’s and Saltzer would give it the market power to demand higher rates for health care services provided by primary care physicians (PCPs) in Nampa, Idaho and surrounding areas, ultimately leading to higher costs for health care consumers. The federal district court held that the acquisition violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Idaho Competition Act, and ordered St. Luke’s to fully divest itself of Saltzer’s physicians and assets. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court ruling.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
121 0069
Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham, P.C.
Date
Citation Number
14-15672
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brief of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Federal Trade Commission before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressing the proper application of Section 809 of the Fair Debt...
File
Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham, P.C.
(114.9 KB)
Jo Batman v. Facebook, Inc.
Date
Citation Number
13-16819
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brief of the Federal Trade Commission urging the Ninth Circuit to reject the district court’s suggestion that the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) preempts state law privacy...
File
Jo Batman v. Facebook, Inc.
(75.07 KB)
Moran v. The Screening Pros LLC
Date
Citation Number
12-57246
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brief of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Federal Trade Commission as amici curiae before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, addressing the question of how long, under...
File
Moran v. The Screening Pros LLC
(163.06 KB)
Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc
Date
Citation Number
04-35394
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
FTC amicus brief arguing that the district court erred in its interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act when it held that an insurance company cannot take “adverse action” against a consumer, as...
File
Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc
(146.03 KB)
American Bankers Ass’n v. Lockyer
Date
Citation Number
04-16334
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Joint amicus brief of the Federal Trade Commission, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of Governors...
File
American Bankers Ass’n v. Lockyer
(1.26 MB)
Spano v. SAFECO Insurance Co
Date
Citation Number
04-35313
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Commission argued that the district court erred in its interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act when it held that an insurance company cannot take “adverse action” against a consumer, as...
File
Spano v. SAFECO Insurance Co
(149.02 KB)
Willes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co
Date
Citation Number
03-35848
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Commission argued that the district court erred in holding that an insurance company cannot take “adverse action” against a consumer, as that term is defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, in...
File
Willes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co
(146.64 KB)
Rausch v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Date
Citation Number
03-35695
Federal Court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Commission argued that the district court erred in holding that an insurance company does not take “adverse action” against a consumer, as that term is defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act...
File
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14