In some situations the FTC files a complaint under its administrative process instead of taking the case to a federal court. This is called an adjudicative proceeding. The party can decide to settle with us or they can contest the charges. If they contest the case it is heard before an administrative law judge in a trial-type proceeding. The Legal Library has information about cases brought by us before an administrative law judge.
Displaying 161 - 180 of 193
Libbey Inc. and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9301
MSC.Software Corporation, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9299
H.J. Heinz Company; Milnot Holding Corporation; and Madison Dearborn Partners Capital, L.P., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9295
Natural Organics, Inc., and Gerald A. Kessler, individually and as an officer of the corporation, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9294
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Carderm Capital L.P., and Andrx Corporation, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9293
California Dental Association, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9259
Swedish Match North America Inc., and National Tobacco Company, L.P., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9296
Dura Lube Corporation, American Direct Marketing, Inc., et al., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9292
Tenet Healthcare Corporation, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9289
Summit Technology, Inc. and VISX, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9286
Motor-Up Corporation, et al., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9291
Ciba-Geigy Corporation / Novartis Corporation, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
952 3272
Docket Number
9279
Intel Corporation, In the Matter of (1999)
An administrative complaint charged that Intel Corporation used its monopoly power to deny three companies continuing access to technical information necessary to develop computer systems based on Intel microprocessors. A consent order (August 3, 1999) prohibits Intel, among other things, from withholding certain advance technical information from a customer as a means of intellectual property licenses. The order protects Intel's rights to withhold its information or microprocessors for legitimate business reasons.
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
951 0028
Docket Number
9288
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9285
Continental Gown Cleaning Service, Inc.; Nationwide Gown Cleaning Service, Inc.; et al., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9287
Jenny Craig, Inc. and Jenny Craig International, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9260
Mesa County Physicians Independent Practice Association, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9284
Brake Guard Products, Inc., and Ed Jones Inc. In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9277
Weight Watchers International, Inc., In the Matter of
Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9261
Displaying 161 - 180 of 193