Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
HealthTrust, Inc. - The Hospital Company, In the Matter of
Toys Unlimited International, Inc., et al., U.S.
Institutional Pharmacy Network, Evergreen Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al., In the Matter of
A final order prohibits five institutional pharmacies from engaging in any joint price negotiation or price agreements for the provision of prescription drugs in an attempt to maximize reimbursement rates with managed care organizations.
Honeywell, Inc., In the Matter of
Automated Systems & Concepts International, Inc.; et al.
Marcovsky, Michael; My Pet Television Network, Inc.; The Pet Channel; et al.
Leon Saja, Donald Ritta, and Southwest Publishing
Bogdana Corporation, Joseph L. Gruber, and Bogda Gruber, In the Matter of
Fastline Publications, Inc., and Mid-America Equipment Retailers Association
The FTC charged that Fastline Publications, Inc., a Kentucky publisher, and Mid-America Equipment Retailers Association, an Indiana trade association representing farm equipment dealers harmed competition when the publisher entered into agreements with the dealers to ban price advertising for new equipment in an attempt not to disclose those dealers who offered discounted prices. According to the FTC, the agreements reduced competition among farm equipment dealers and deprived consumers of truthful and nondeceptive price information. The agreement to settle the charges prohibited Fastline and Mid-America from restricting the advertising of prices for farm equipment in the future.
Western Direct Marketing Group, Inc., and Western International Media Corporation., In the Matter of
American Urological Corp., et al.
Statement of Commissioner Thompson - In the Matter of Beck's North America, Inc
Saffer, Michael A., and Daniel L. Coutinho
McKesson Corp. and AmeriSource Health Corp
The Commission authorized staff to file separate motions in federal district court to block the mergers of the nation's four largest drug wholesalers into two wholesale distributors of pharmaceutical products. The Commission charged that Cardinal 's proposed acquisition of Bergen Brunswig Corporation and McKesson Corporation's proposed acquisition of AmeriSource Health Corp. would substantially reduce competition in the market for prescription drug wholesaling and lead to higher prices and a reduction in services to the companies' customers --hospitals, nursing homes and drugstores --and eventually to consumers. Two separate motions for preliminary injunctions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia March 6, 1998. On July 31, 1998, the District Court granted the Commission's motions enjoining both proposed mergers. The parties abandoned their respective merger plans soon after the decision.